| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 [9] 10 |
161. WTS Levi alt - in Character Bazaar [original thread]
I know gemblog* isn't the most reliable tool, but you know something's wrong when it spits out a result at 65% of your asking price. The Leviathan is like the least popular titan as it can only shoot structures which is probably why you're getting...
- by CynoNet Two - at 2012.01.12 00:06:00
|
162. Sticky:New dev blog: Little improvements: Making the world a little better pt.2 - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
Great stuff here. Here's some more for next time! Let us 'Stack All' items in a corp hangar / drone bay that's nearly full just like we can in a cargohold. It's really frustrating having to pull items out of a corp hangar then drop them back ...
- by CynoNet Two - at 2012.01.11 17:40:00
|
163. Turrets and Remote Repair - How a minor tweak can revitalise combat - in Jita Park Speakers Corner [original thread]
Draconus Lofwyr wrote: but using that same logic, shouldn't a ship that has been primaried have some of the incoming damage reduced as the incoming fire gets so high that rounds start colliding and missiles explode when hit by incoming laser fi...
- by CynoNet Two - at 2012.01.10 10:24:00
|
164. Turrets and Remote Repair - How a minor tweak can revitalise combat - in Jita Park Speakers Corner [original thread]
I dream of a day when I can fly around in my elite PVP gang and see a new fleet. Not just another Drake/Tengu blob or yet another Alphafleet - but rather something new designed to exploit the weakness of another. And the next day, someone will co...
- by CynoNet Two - at 2012.01.09 04:09:00
|
165. Turrets and Remote Repair - How a minor tweak can revitalise combat - in Jita Park Speakers Corner [original thread]
Two key elements in EVE combat have somewhat... wonky implementation. Turrets are nigh-impossible to balance around many ship classes, as no matter how much you tweak tracking they can always kill an unintended target outright. This has been true ...
- by CynoNet Two - at 2012.01.09 03:41:00
|
166. [proposal] Allow stacking of BPCs with same stats - in Assembly Hall [original thread]
Aineko Macx wrote: As stated by subject. CCP once stated they weren't looking into it because BPCs can have varying stats (runs, ME, PE). In practice, however, the people that have the most BPCs are the ones making copies, which usually have i...
- by CynoNet Two - at 2012.01.08 20:20:00
|
167. Sticky:Balancing Feedback: Capital Ships - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Soon Shin wrote: Capital Shield Transporters have had their cpu fitting decreased significantly: Data from Sisi: Capital Murky Shield Screen Transmitter I cpu: 157.0 => 126.0 Capital Shield Transporter I cpu: 175.0 => 140.0 I don't fl...
- by CynoNet Two - at 2012.01.08 16:59:00
|
168. WTs 31mil sp tengu/falcon.arazu alt - in Character Bazaar [original thread]
5bn
- by CynoNet Two - at 2012.01.02 23:54:00
|
169. Local chat and cloaking... a Three Point Plan - in Assembly Hall [original thread]
Tarunik Raqalth'Qui wrote: No. Don't nerf W-space into the ground. Ingvar Angst wrote: This part is bad. What you're doing is nerfing the **** out of wormholes (for those things that could be used in wormholes) or setting a precedent for t...
- by CynoNet Two - at 2011.12.30 14:45:00
|
170. [WTS] 49.8mil SP T2 Cruiser/Golem pilot NO INDY WASTE ('05char) - in Character Bazaar [original thread]
Mooninite wrote: This auction now has an end date: acution will now end at Wednesday the 3rd. B/O is still 13bil, unless you convince me to go lower. Is that Tuesday the 3rd or Wed the 4th?
- by CynoNet Two - at 2011.12.27 23:19:00
|
171. Local chat and cloaking... a Three Point Plan - in Assembly Hall [original thread]
Removing local chat and (AFK) cloaking - Two subjects that have been done to death. Let's waste some time discussing a combined solution that CCP will never implement! a) Enforce constellational chat as local is now. All players online in a con...
- by CynoNet Two - at 2011.12.27 02:22:00
|
172. Sticky:Balancing Feedback: Capital Ships - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Xtover wrote: Post with your main. He did on the last page. Roboticus420 wrote: Phunnestyle wrote: I LOL@U over & over. +1 Signed I had my money on him being NCdot too, as he didn't bite on the ev0ke comments I made. +1 to ...
- by CynoNet Two - at 2011.12.17 12:19:00
|
173. Sticky:Balancing Feedback: Capital Ships - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Headerman wrote: CynoNet Two wrote: As for the proposed shield changes (instant fleet bonus application, deadspace invulns, etc) they were proposed in here fairly late on in the Cruicible development cycle, and as such probably haven't been ...
- by CynoNet Two - at 2011.12.16 08:39:00
|
174. Sticky:Balancing Feedback: Capital Ships - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Phunnestyle wrote: ROFL like your interesting little rant about restrictions of Subcaps in comparison to Supers. Let me think ohh a BS for instance, ermm lets say 200mill with fittings relatively low SP character able to max out the use. &...
- by CynoNet Two - at 2011.12.15 00:17:00
|
175. Sticky:Balancing Feedback: Capital Ships - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
MastahFR wrote: Can we get the troll post removed from here ? They have no purpose here. And we (shield capitals and super capitals (especially the Hel pilots)) are waiting on CCP feedback on when the change will hit singularity. Also, CCP, we...
- by CynoNet Two - at 2011.12.13 23:51:00
|
176. I want your little things! - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
darkdooku wrote: This may sound crazy and possibly not do-able, but I think it would be cool to be able to tractor beam abandoned/disconnected drones and/or tractor beam my sentry drones. For sentry drones they could have the limitation of bein...
- by CynoNet Two - at 2011.12.13 19:37:00
|
177. I want your little things! - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Reicine Ceer wrote: CTRL+A, or multi-select (etc), should have a right-click option to Un-Stack All. That way when we select all those modules again and hit "Fit to Active Ship", it does it all in one go. Or alternatively, right click a sta...
- by CynoNet Two - at 2011.12.13 19:35:00
|
178. Sticky:Balancing Feedback: Capital Ships - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Svennig wrote: Venustas Blue wrote: Svennig wrote: Keep spamming phunnestyle. I'm sure being an annoying ass will do loads to make CCP consider your argument carefully. His arguements arn't just his, they are alot of peoples arguement...
- by CynoNet Two - at 2011.12.13 09:53:00
|
179. Sticky:Balancing Feedback: Capital Ships - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Phunnestyle wrote: 1. There has been several pages + of valid reasons from a multitude of various alliances to why the supers drone bay should be a manditory capacity for 20 Fighter Bombers & 20 Fighters & not 1 reason why there should...
- by CynoNet Two - at 2011.12.12 11:01:00
|
180. E-bay like seller rating system. - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Let me just ask a few of my 7000 alliance mates to help make me the most reliable scammer person in the world.
- by CynoNet Two - at 2011.12.10 21:31:00
|
| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 [9] 10 |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |